This is the second test in this series. For more details, see test 1.
This time we will test the motor with aluminum wire coils. This material has a slightly different characteristic from copper, with higher electrical resistance and being lighter.
The circuit used is the same as in test 1.
The test environment is composed of the motor and a 30cm diameter propeller.
The development board contains:
The figure below shows the control circuit. The switching sensor can be an optical sensor or a hall sensor. For this test, we will use an optical sensor.
Electrical characteristics:
This motor was designed to work with voltages between 60 and 160VDC.
The motor is approximately 30% lighter than the other version with copper coils.
The test was executed from start to finish, meaning the motor was running continuously for 50 minutes.
Each result row was obtained with the motor running for 10 minutes.
The ambient temperature was constant, around 24.3°C.
Voltage (V) | Current (A) | Power (W) | Temperature (°C) |
---|---|---|---|
60 | 0.04 | 2.4 | 25.0 |
70 | 0.05 | 3.5 | 25.2 |
80 | 0.6 | 4.7 | 25.4 |
90 | 0.6 | 5.4 | 25.6 |
96.5 | 0.07 | 6.7 | 25.9 |
The rows below show the performance of the motor with this topology.
Voltage (V) | Current (A) | Power (W) | Speed (rpm) |
---|---|---|---|
60 | 0.04 | 2.4 | 744 |
70 | 0.05 | 3.5 | 849 |
80 | 0.6 | 4.7 | 930 |
90 | 0.6 | 5.4 | 1023 |
96,5 | 0.07 | 6.7 | 1092 |
As shown in test 1, this topology is reliable.
Comparing the power comsumption, aluminum was slightly superior to copper:
Material | Voltage (V) | Current (A) | Power (W) | Speed (rpm) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Copper | 80 | 0.10 | 8.0 | 1098 |
Aluminum | 96.5 | 0.07 | 6.7 | 1092 |
More tests at higher power levels and for longer periods of time should be more conclusive.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me.